The narrator seems to be trying to be positive about Indiana while shedding
light on its shortcomings, but it really comes across as anti-Indiana. (For
example, “if Indiana is the bastard son of the
Midwest, then Evansville is Indiana ’s snot-nosed stepchild.”)
There are passages that are well written and interesting,
and that’s why I kept reading and finished it, but it did not hold together as
a book for me. One example of a passage I liked: “Indiana is rural, agricultural, and
surrounded by bully states with great confidence in their own sophistication.”
I am guessing that much of this is truly autobiographical, and perhaps the book
would have worked better as nonfiction. (The cover says the author “grew up in
southern Indiana
and spent two years working as a professional birdwatcher”.)
The title is not very representative of the whole book. There is an incident
when the narrator is a child involving a snapping turtle, but the incident was not, in my
opinion, important enough to be used as the book’s title.
If you are a fan of quirky literary fiction, or like to read about Indiana, Snapper might
appeal to you. I read an advance reader’s edition of Snapper. It will be
published in April.
No comments:
Post a Comment